Supported Blockchains

BlockchainAnalysis.io supports wallet screening and compliance analysis across 52 blockchains spanning EVM-compatible networks, UTXO-based chains, and other architectures including Solana, Cosmos ecosystem chains, Move-based chains, and more.

Complete Blockchain Coverage

The following table lists every supported blockchain with its architecture type and feature capabilities.

Feature definitions:

  • Token Tracking — The platform tracks native token and fungible token (ERC-20, SPL, BEP-20, etc.) transfers for risk analysis.
  • DeFi Support — DeFi protocol interactions (swaps, lending, LP, yield farming) are decoded and included in screening reports.
  • NFT Tracking — NFT mints, transfers, and marketplace activity are tracked and included in screening reports.
  • Real-Time Monitoring — The chain supports continuous monitoring with alerts for new transactions and risk score changes.

EVM-Compatible Chains (22)

| # | Blockchain | Type | Token Tracking | DeFi Support | NFT Tracking | Real-Time Monitoring | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | Ethereum | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 2 | BNB Smart Chain (BSC) | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 3 | Polygon | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 4 | Arbitrum | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 5 | Optimism | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 6 | Base | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 7 | Avalanche C-Chain | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 8 | Fantom | EVM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 9 | Cronos | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 10 | Gnosis | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 11 | Celo | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 12 | Moonbeam | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 13 | Moonriver | EVM | Yes | Limited | Limited | Yes | | 14 | zkSync Era | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 15 | Polygon zkEVM | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 16 | Linea | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 17 | Scroll | EVM | Yes | Limited | Limited | Yes | | 18 | Mantle | EVM | Yes | Limited | Limited | Yes | | 19 | Blast | EVM | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 20 | Mode | EVM | Yes | Limited | No | Yes | | 21 | Manta Pacific | EVM | Yes | Limited | No | Yes | | 22 | opBNB | EVM | Yes | Limited | No | Yes |

UTXO-Based Chains (4)

| # | Blockchain | Type | Token Tracking | DeFi Support | NFT Tracking | Real-Time Monitoring | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 23 | Bitcoin | UTXO | Yes (BRC-20, Runes) | No | Yes (Ordinals) | Yes | | 24 | Litecoin | UTXO | Yes | No | No | Yes | | 25 | Bitcoin Cash | UTXO | Yes (CashTokens) | No | No | Yes | | 26 | Dogecoin | UTXO | Yes | No | No | Yes |

Other Architectures (12)

| # | Blockchain | Type | Token Tracking | DeFi Support | NFT Tracking | Real-Time Monitoring | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 27 | Solana | SVM | Yes (SPL Tokens) | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 28 | NEAR | NEAR | Yes (NEP-141) | Yes | Yes (NEP-171) | Yes | | 29 | Tron | TVM | Yes (TRC-20) | Yes | Yes (TRC-721) | Yes | | 30 | Cosmos Hub | Cosmos SDK | Yes (IBC tokens) | Limited | No | Yes | | 31 | Osmosis | Cosmos SDK | Yes (IBC tokens) | Yes | No | Yes | | 32 | Injective | Cosmos SDK | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 33 | Sei | Cosmos SDK | Yes | Yes | Limited | Yes | | 34 | Sui | Move (Sui) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 35 | Aptos | Move (Aptos) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 36 | TON | TON | Yes (Jettons) | Yes | Yes | Yes | | 37 | XRP Ledger (Ripple) | XRPL | Yes (Issued Currencies) | Limited (AMM) | Yes (XLS-20) | Yes | | 38 | Stellar | Stellar | Yes (Stellar Assets) | Limited (Soroban) | No | Yes |

Architecture-Specific Notes

EVM Chains

All 22 EVM-compatible chains share the same address format (0x followed by 40 hexadecimal characters). When you submit an EVM address for screening, BlockchainAnalysis.io checks activity across all supported EVM chains by default. You can also target a specific chain if needed.

Key EVM screening capabilities:

  • Smart contract interaction decoding — The platform decodes function calls and event logs for known protocols, providing human-readable descriptions of what each transaction did.
  • Internal transaction tracing — Traces value transfers that occur within smart contract execution (not visible in standard transaction logs).
  • Token approval tracking — Identifies active token approvals that could represent security risks.
  • Multi-chain entity resolution — If an address is active on multiple EVM chains, the entity resolution considers all chains holistically. An entity identified on Ethereum will be recognized on Arbitrum, Polygon, and other EVM chains.

For newer EVM chains (Mode, Manta Pacific, opBNB), DeFi and NFT coverage is expanding as the ecosystems mature. Entity database coverage on these chains is proportional to their total activity volume and entity diversity.

UTXO Chains

UTXO-based blockchains (Bitcoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Dogecoin) use a fundamentally different transaction model than account-based chains. Key differences in how screening works:

  • Address clustering — UTXO chains allow powerful clustering heuristics based on common input ownership. When multiple addresses are used as inputs in a single transaction, they are assumed to be controlled by the same entity. This enables the platform to link large clusters of addresses to single entities.
  • Change address detection — The platform identifies change outputs to avoid false positive counterparty attributions.
  • CoinJoin detection — Specialized algorithms detect CoinJoin transactions (a form of mixing on Bitcoin) and flag them appropriately in the mixer exposure risk factor.
  • BRC-20 and Ordinals — On Bitcoin, the platform tracks BRC-20 token transfers and Ordinals (NFT) inscriptions, which use the witness data space.

Solana

Solana uses a unique account model distinct from both EVM and UTXO chains:

  • Program interaction decoding — The platform decodes instructions for major Solana programs (Token Program, Associated Token Account, SPL Token-2022, and major DeFi protocols like Raydium, Orca, Marinade, Jupiter).
  • SPL Token tracking — All SPL token transfers are tracked, including token-2022 extensions with transfer fees and confidential transfers.
  • NFT support — Full support for Metaplex NFT standard, including compressed NFTs (cNFTs).

Cosmos Ecosystem (Cosmos Hub, Osmosis, Injective, Sei)

The Cosmos ecosystem uses IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) for cross-chain transfers:

  • IBC transfer tracking — Cross-chain IBC transfers between Cosmos ecosystem chains are traced end-to-end. A transfer from Cosmos Hub to Osmosis is tracked as a continuous flow, not two independent transactions.
  • Staking analysis — Delegation, undelegation, and reward claims are tracked. Validator selection patterns can provide entity attribution signals.
  • Governance participation — Governance votes are tracked as supplementary entity attribution data.

Move-Based Chains (Sui, Aptos)

Sui and Aptos both use the Move programming language but with different implementations:

  • Object model (Sui) — Sui's object-centric model is fully supported, including shared objects, owned objects, and dynamic fields.
  • Resource model (Aptos) — Aptos's resource-based account model is supported with full resource tracking.
  • Both chains support DeFi and NFT tracking with coverage for major protocols in each ecosystem.

TON

The Open Network has a unique architecture with its workchain model:

  • Jetton tracking — All Jetton (TON token standard) transfers are tracked.
  • NFT support — TON NFT standard (TEP-62) items and collections are tracked.
  • DeFi coverage — Major TON DeFi protocols (STON.fi, DeDust) are supported.

XRP Ledger

The XRP Ledger has native features that affect screening:

  • Issued currencies — Tokens issued on XRPL (IOUs) are tracked with issuer attribution.
  • Payment channels — Off-ledger payment channel activity is flagged when channels are opened or closed.
  • AMM support — The native XRPL AMM (activated in 2024) is supported with limited DeFi coverage.
  • Destination tags — Destination tags are used to distinguish individual users at exchanges and are incorporated into entity resolution.

Stellar

Stellar's compliance-focused architecture provides additional signals:

  • Stellar Assets — All asset transfers are tracked with issuer attribution.
  • Soroban — Limited DeFi support for Stellar's smart contract platform (Soroban), expanding as the ecosystem grows.
  • Anchors — Stellar anchor (on/off-ramp) interactions are identified and attributed.

Coverage Depth by Chain

Not all chains have equal depth of entity database coverage. Coverage depth is a function of chain maturity, transaction volume, entity diversity, and data source availability.

| Tier | Coverage Level | Chains | |---|---|---| | Tier 1 — Deepest coverage | 90%+ of transaction volume attributed to known entities | Ethereum, Bitcoin, BSC, Tron, XRP | | Tier 2 — Strong coverage | 70-90% of transaction volume attributed | Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Solana, Litecoin, Avalanche C-Chain, Base | | Tier 3 — Good coverage | 50-70% of transaction volume attributed | Fantom, Cronos, Gnosis, NEAR, Dogecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Cosmos Hub, Osmosis, TON | | Tier 4 — Developing coverage | 30-50% of transaction volume attributed | Moonbeam, Moonriver, zkSync Era, Polygon zkEVM, Linea, Celo, Injective, Sei, Sui, Aptos, Stellar | | Tier 5 — Early coverage | Less than 30% of transaction volume attributed | Scroll, Mantle, Blast, Mode, Manta Pacific, opBNB |

Lower coverage tiers do not mean the screening is less reliable — it means there are more unattributed addresses, which are assigned a default uncertainty penalty in the Entity Reputation risk factor. The platform clearly indicates coverage tier in every screening report so you can calibrate your risk assessment accordingly.

Chain Addition Roadmap

BlockchainAnalysis.io continuously evaluates new blockchains for addition based on:

  1. Transaction volume and TVL — Chains with significant economic activity are prioritized.
  2. Regulatory relevance — Chains that are subject to or referenced in regulatory guidance are prioritized.
  3. Customer demand — Enterprise customers can request specific chain additions through their account manager.
  4. Data source availability — Chains with accessible full archive nodes and established indexing infrastructure are faster to integrate.

To request support for a blockchain not currently covered, contact support@blockchainanalysis.io or submit a request through the dashboard at Settings > Feature Requests.

Cross-Chain Analysis

One of BlockchainAnalysis.io's most important capabilities is cross-chain analysis — the ability to trace fund flows that span multiple blockchains via bridges. When an address on Ethereum bridges funds to Arbitrum via a supported bridge protocol, the platform traces the full flow as a single continuous transaction rather than treating the Ethereum side and Arbitrum side as independent events.

Supported bridge protocols for cross-chain tracing include:

| Bridge Protocol | Chains Connected | |---|---| | Wormhole | Ethereum, Solana, BSC, Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Sui, Aptos, NEAR | | LayerZero / Stargate | Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, Fantom, Base, Linea, Mantle | | Across | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base, zkSync Era, Linea | | Orbiter Finance | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync Era, Polygon zkEVM, Linea, Scroll, Base, Mantle, Blast | | Multichain (legacy) | Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Fantom, Avalanche (historical data only) | | IBC (Cosmos) | Cosmos Hub, Osmosis, Injective, Sei (native cross-chain protocol) | | Polygon Bridge | Ethereum, Polygon | | Arbitrum Bridge | Ethereum, Arbitrum | | Optimism Bridge | Ethereum, Optimism | | Base Bridge | Ethereum, Base | | zkSync Bridge | Ethereum, zkSync Era |

Cross-chain tracing is essential for detecting sophisticated laundering patterns where actors bridge funds across multiple chains to obscure the trail. The platform's ability to follow these flows end-to-end is a key compliance capability.

BlockchainAnalysis.io — Digital Asset Compliance Platform